“Spain is not Greece.” Elena Salgado, Spanish Finance minister, February, 2010. “Portugal is not Greece.” The Economist, April 2010. “Greece is not Ireland.” George Papaconstantinou, Greek Finance minister, November, 2010. “Spain is neither Ireland nor Portugal.” Elena Salgado, Spanish Finance minister, November 2010. “Ireland is not in ‘Greek Territory.’”Irish Finance Minister Brian Lenihan. November 2010. “Neither Spain nor Portugal is Ireland.” Angel Gurria, Secretary-general OECD, November, 2010. “Spain is not Uganda” Spanish PM Rajoy. June, 2012. |
Archives of “economist” tag
rssChina Announces Huge Trade Deficit
China announced on Saturday the first trade deficit within the last six years. Although a deficit was expected, nobody anticipated the numbers would reach $7.24 billion.
The last trade deficit in the country came in April of 2004 and was $2.26 billion.
For the month of March, the country’s imports totaled $119.35 billion and exports reached $112.11 billion. Both of these numbers are up drastically in comparison to March of 2009.
The deficit will more than likely turn around within the near future, but the numbers are enough to spark concern in the eyes of the Chinese.
The deficit in March mainly came from China’s trade with Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, Customs said, while it continued to run surpluses with the U.S. and the European Union. Those big trading partners have been among those arguing that China’s practice of keeping the yuan effectively pegged to the U.S. dollar gives its exporters an unfair advantage and contribute to the large trade surpluses.
All of this comes at a time when the United States and leaders throughout Europe are pushing China to increase the value of the yuan, which economist suspect is nearly 40% undervalued.
Ramayana On Wealth
In Ramayana Guru Vashistha explains to Lord Rama that in this world, wealth is the most important thing. There is not much difference between a poor and a dead person . A wealthy person seeking after Dharma and prosperity will succeed at all cost but the poor person striving for prosperity will find it difficult to attain.
Sage Vyasa writes in Mahabharata, that through wealth one attains Dharma, Kama and Moksha. Even day to day life in this world is not possible without wealth in hand. Hence, the Artha is important for rest of the three, Dharma, Kama and Moksha. The great economist Chanakya writes in his sutras that the root of human happiness lies in Dharma, and the root of Dharma is wealth and prosperity. The motive of any karma or action is the gain of wealth and prosperity which bestows dharma and Kama. Chanakya has also mentioned in his work that one who has wealth and prosperity has friends and relatives and only then he is considered as a man and he is able to live his life according to his wishes. |
Rosie’s Rules to Remember (an Economist’s Dozen)
1. In order for an economic forecast to be relevant, it must be combined with a market call.
2. Never be a slave to the date – they are no substitute for astute observation of the big picture.
3. The consensus rarely gets it right and almost always errs on the side of optimism – except at the bottom.
4. Fall in love with your partner, not your forecast.
5. No two cycles are ever the same.
6. Never hide behind your model.
7. Always seek out corroborating evidence.
8. Have respect for what the markets are telling you.
9. Be constantly aware with your forecast horizon – many clients live in the short run.
10. Of all the market forecasters, Mr. Bond gets it right most often.
11. Highlight the risks to your forecasts.
12. Get the US consumer right and everything else will take care of itself.
13. Expansions are more fun than recessions (straight from Bob Farrell’s quiver!).
The Most Influential Prizes in the World is The Nobel Prize in Economics
I’ve been mum on the Nobel prize in economics because I honestly don’t know much about Jean Tirole and his microeconomic work. But I think we should silence one discussion that inevitably arises every time the award is handed out. That’s the idea that the award is somehow fake or something. It’s true that the award in economics wasn’t conceived by Alfred Nobel and was added over 70 years after he died. And it’s true that the award was created by the Swedish Central Bank in large part to celebrate its 300th anniversary. So what?
No matter how many times people say that the award isn’t “official” it just doesn’t matter. The reason why is because the award actually acts as an incredibly powerful status symbol. If you’re an economist with a Nobel prize you are automatically lifted onto a pedestal above everyone else. Your words carry greater influence and your impact on the world undoubtedly increases. This is particularly true in the field of economics because economists have such a tremendous impact on public policy which impacts all of us.
In my opinion, it doesn’t matter one bit if Alfred Nobel didn’t conceive the award. It doesn’t matter if certain people think it’s fake. The bottom line is that winning the Nobel prize in economics is a huge huge deal that lifts the winner from being important to being beyond important. Alfred Nobel might not have approved of the award, but the fact that his name is attached to the economics prize is a big deal. And its winners will continue to have a tremendous impact on all of our lives in the future. That reason alone makes the Nobel in Economics important and arguably more important and impactful than any other Nobel that is awarded.
Oh, and congratulations Mr. Tirole! Don’t let your new found influence go to waste….
New Economist cover: Is this really the end? Pic of euro burning up like fireball
Observations About Jesse Livermore
In his book “How to Trade Stocks” Richard Smitten talks about Jesse Livermore the man and his trading techniques. Here are some of his observations about the legend Jesse Livermore.
He quickly learned that it was never what the brokers, or the customers, or the newspapers said — the only thing that was important was what the tape said. The tape had a life of its own, and its was the most important life. Its verdict was final.
He learned to be interested only in the change in price, not the reason for the change. He had no time to waste trying to rationalize the action of the stock. There could be a million reasons why the price had changed. These reasons would be revealed later, after the fact.
He knew that unless he actually purchased a stock, he could never know how he would handle himself. When a trader made a bet everything changed, and he knew it. Then and only then did the trader enter the heated jungle of emotions.. .fear and greed. You either control them or they control you.
He worked alone.. .never telling anyone what he was doing, never taking on a partner. The trill came from the winning, not the money, though the money was nice.
He never blamed the market. It was illogical to get angry at an inanimate object, like a gambler getting mad at a deck of cards. There was no arguing with the tape. The tape was always right; it was the players who were wrong.
His first conclusion was that he won when all the factors were in his favor, when he was patient and waited for all the ducks to line up in a row. That led him to his second conclusion, that no one could or should trade the market all the time. There were times when a trader should be out of the market, in cash, waiting.
To speculate, a trader had to be a player, not a theorist, or an economist, or an analyst. A speculator had to be a player with money down on the table. It was not the coach or the team’s owner who won the game, it was the players on the field — just as it was not the generals who won the battle, it was the grunts on the ground.
You had to lose, because it taught you what not to do… his conclusions were developing from actual trading, from hands-on participation in the market and constant analysis.
He never used the words bull market or bear market because these terms tended to make too permanent a psychological mind-set.
Livermore was looking for the difference between stock gambling and stock speculation. Livermore’s final conclusion was clear: To anticipate the market is to gamble; to be patient and react only when the market gives the signal is to speculate.
The first step was to concentrate on the overall market before making a trade. He would follow the line of least resistance— up in a bull market, buy long, down in a bear market, sell short. If the market went sideways, he would wait in cash for a clear direction to be established…. He would not anticipate the market by guessing its direction… .Livermore had come to realize that the big money was in the big swings… .it is the big moves that make the big money.
Livermore believed that stocks are never too high to begin buying or too low to begin selling short. Livermore believed that there was only one side of the market to avoid. He could be on the bull side or the bear side — it made no difference to Livermore — just as long as he was not on the wrong side.
From experience, Livermore knew that one of the hardest things to do as a trader was to sell out a position early if he was wrong on the initial purchase and the stock moved against him.
He did not care why things happened in the market, he cared only what happened every day when the market opened…. He observed that the market always did what it wanted to do, not what it was expected to do.
Livermore had a steadfast rule that if something serendipitous, an unplanned windfall, should occur, he must capitalize on it and not be greedy — accept his good fortune and close out his position.
Livermore loved the fact that in trading the market there was no end to the learning process. The game was never over, and he could never know enough to beat the market all the time. The puzzle could never be solved…he never considered himself a market master. He always considered himself a market student who occasionally traded correctly.
Livermore had long ago realized that the stock market was never obvious. It was designed to fool most of the people most of the time. His rules were based on thinking against the grain: cut your losses quickly; let your profits ride unless there’s a good reason to close out the position; the action is with the leading stocks, which change with every new market; new highs are to be bought on breakouts; cheap stocks are often not a bargain, because they have little potential to rise in price. The stock market is a study in cycles. It never goes up forever, nor does it go down forever, but when it changes direction it remains in that new trend until it is stopped.
He considered it necessary to act like a poker player in his business, to never tip his hand or to react emotionally. Because of this inability and unwillingness to express his emotions, the stress on him was permanent.
Timing was everything to a speculator. It was never if a stock was going to move; it was when a stock was going to move up or down.
Livermore always considered time as a real and essential trading element. He often would say it’s not the thinking that makes the money — it’s the sitting and waiting that makes the money… .This has been incorrectly interpreted by many people to mean that Livermore would buy a stock and then sit and wait for it to move. This is not so. There were many occasions where Livermore sat and waited in cash, holding little or no stock, until the right situation appeared. He was able to sit and wait patiently in cash until the perfect situation presented itself to him. When conditions came together, when as many of the odds as possible were in his favor, then and only then would he strike.
Livermore let the market tell him what to do, he got his clues and his cues from what the market told him. He did not anticipate, he followed the message he received from the tape.
It’s scary to think how much money Livermore would make if he traded today.. .his ability to read the tape when the tape wasn’t even that reliable. He is in our opinion the best ever. Since the market is an extension of human psychology and human emotion and because people don’t change, the market doesn’t change. The players change; the underlying issues change; trading doesn’t change, and that’s why over 60 years after he committed suicide, Livermore’s words of wisdom are still relevant.