For most people, trend following is extremely counter-intuitive. Why? Because it’s human nature to look for bargains before buying. People tend to buy when it’s low and sell when it’s high. But, how many are bold enough to do the opposite by buying high and selling even higher? My guess is; not many. And what about risk management? Yeah, what about it? Remember the dot com bubble era? Out of all the people that got caught up in that frenzy, how many do you think even had a risk management plan in place? Hmmm…
Back in those days, I’ve never even heard of a stop loss. We all just jumped in blindly with dreams of making it big. And a lot of us got burned. Really bad. All the warning signs where there and yet we chose to ignore it. We foolishly rode our stocks all the way down and in the process, destroying every little glimmer of hope that we had for a turn-around. A lot of us lost 80-90% of our so-called “long term investment.” It’s tragic. But we can all learn from this valuable lesson.
Trend following is a life philosophy. It works in trading and it also works in daily life. It’s simply a matter of sticking with what works and getting rid of what’s not. That’s it! It’s a deceptively simple little system that can be applied into all aspects of your life. And if you follow this line of thought, I guarantee that you will see dramatic improvements. You just can’t help but to get better because ultimately, what are you left with in the end? That’s right, WINNERS!
Archives of “line of thought” tag
rssThoughts on Human Nature and Speculation – Humphrey B. Neil
The chapter entitled, “More Thoughts on Human Nature and Speculation”, includes some classic thinking on aspects of human psychology which prevent us from operating profitably in the markets. A passage from Neil on the dangers of greed follows this line of thought:
“…I have watched traders in brokers’ offices with deep interest, and have tried to learn the traits that crippled their profits. The desire to “make a killing”—greed—has impressed me particularly.
Perhaps this desire to squeeze the last point out of a trade is the most difficult to fight against. It is also the most dangerous. How often has it happened in your own case that you have entered a commitment with a conservatively set goal, which your judgment has told you was reasonable, only to throw over your resolutions when your stock has reached that point, because you thought “there were four more points in the move?”
The irony of it is that seemingly nine times out of ten (I know, for it has happened with me) the stock does not reach your hoped-for objective; then—to add humiliation to lost profits—it goes against you for another number of points; and, like as not, you end up with no profit at all, or a loss.
Maybe it would help you if I told you what I have done to keep me in my traces: I have opened a simple set of books, just as if I were operating with money belonging to someone else. I have set down what would be considered a fair return on speculative capital, and have opened an account for losses as well as for gains, knowing that the real secret of speculative success lies in taking losses quickly when I think my judgment has been wrong.
When a commitment is earning fair profits, and is acting as I had judged it should act, I let my profits run. But, so soon as I think that my opinion has been erroneous, I endeavor to get out quickly and not to allow my greed to force me to hold for those ephemeral, hoped-for points. Nor do I allow my pride to prevent an admission of error. I had rather, by far, accept the fact that I have been wrong than accept large losses…”
This looks like worthwhile study material, so read on and don’t mind the fact that most of the references date back to 1930. Time honored wisdom is the best, and sound practices are applicable in any age.
Democracy Failure Follows Market Failure
Some very spicy comments from the Hungarian prime minister who basically tells the world to get lost (please admire effort to remain polite on his part). In so many words it’s not his fault, it’s the previous administration’s fault. Sounds familiar? Obama has used it at will, Greece has used it, I heard Sarkozy use it, and just about everybody else! Even Republicans who campaigned to “Drill baby drill!” now blame the BP fiasco on Obama. Needless to say political courage is something that no longer exists, and populism has been the only political program offered to us for now a solid 40 years. The natural extension is for a Prime Minister to just walk in and say: “You know what screw you guys, we will default, I am not taking back tax cuts that got me elected, I am not telling people who were promised early retirement that really it’s not feasible, I’m just not going to deal with any of this. Let’s just default and keep doing what we were doing”. In the same line of thought the French PM declared this morning that there is nothing bad about EURUSD at parity.
If you think it’s bad to sell someone a mortgage they can’t pay, how about promising them a lifestyle they can’t afford! Washington has some nerve to blame the financial industry: “a house for every American” was their idea. Granted there is plenty of blame and jail time deserved at many financial institutions but it is true also for Congress. I used to think that over the past 40 years the commodity that was most devalued was human labor but I have changed my mind. A man’s word no longer has any value in most cases. Should the law be changed so that it holds our leaders accountable for their words? Why not, we would get a hell of a clean slate and something to be finally hopeful about. That is change I would believe in for sure. (more…)