“I believe that truth is healthy and that most people can get what they want if they understand what is true and learn how to successfully deal with it. But I recognize that some people have problems applying this to their and others’ mistakes and weaknesses. That is because there commonly exists a stupid paradigm that “successful” people don’t make mistakes and don’t have weaknesses, whereas the truth is that everyone makes mistakes and has weaknesses. I believe that most important difference between “successful” people and “unsuccessful” people is that the successful people recognize their mistakes so that they learn from them and they recognize their weaknesses so they develop strategies to get around them.”
Archives of “paradigm” tag
rssSex appeal and Trading
Trading is marketed as sexy profession. If you are good at trading, well you must be incredibly smart, good looking, funny, and of course, rich! We all know this furthest from truth. Traders are pale, unkept and have bad posture. I kid.
One of the biggest aspects of of trading is psychology, the manipulation and control of our biggest sex organ of all, our brain. However, an often overlooked aspect of trading psychology is mental framing – how we position our thoughts and ideas about the market. (more…)
Sex Appeal and Trading
Trading is marketed as sexy profession. If you are good at trading, well you must be incredibly smart, good looking, funny, and of course, rich! We all know this furthest from truth. Traders are pale, unkept and have bad posture. I kid.One of the biggest aspects of of trading is psychology, the manipulation and control of our biggest sex organ of all, our brain. However, an often overlooked aspect of trading psychology is mental framing – how we position our thoughts and ideas about the market.
Newer traders approach trading from a “right versus wrong” perspective. They devise their trading system based on a false sense of security believing certain setups and strategies can be designed to give them”right” signals and helps them avoid “wrong” signals. (more…)
The Essence of Success
Charles Dow used to counsel that no individual should ever be promoted if they hadn’t made a large error at some point. Phil Fisher used to insist only in investing in those stocks that had management teams willing to make big mistakes. If they didn’t make mistakes, they wouldn’t also take the risks required for success. Is this the essence of success? How does a corporate management team, upon the fruition of such errors, survive being “stopped out” of their positions in today’s hair twitch paradigm? Is being expropriated from your career rather than your capital not the bigger risk today? And thus can it only be stocks with founder, family or veto shareholdings that make for truly great growth stocks today? Should not Tim Cook undertake an LBO with the Qataris?