rss

12 Cognitive Biases that Prevent you From Being Rational

Confirmation Bias – The tendency for people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or ideas.  Investors and economists often fail to fully appreciate other views due to a narrow minded view of the world often resulting from what they think they already know.

Ingroup bias – the tendency to favor one’s own group.  In investing and economics we see this in ideologies and particular strategies.  Austrians favor those who believe their own thinking.  Chartists dislike value investors.  Often times, the strongest economists and investors are the ones who are able to move beyond this ingroup bias and explore the potential that other groups have something positive to contribute.

Gambler’s Fallacy – When an individual erroneously believes that the onset of a certain random event is less likely to happen following an event or a series of events.  We see this in trading all the time.  This is the belief that just because something has occurred in the past that it is more likely to occur in the future.  The “trend is your friend” and that sort of thing….

Post-Purchase Rationalization – When one rationalizes past purchases after the fact in an attempt to justify past actions.  Investors often learn about how a bad trade turns into an investment when they rationalize their past purchases.  If you’ve been in the business for a while you know how destructive this can be. (more…)

Paralysis By Analysis

When too much information is amassed, a person is unable to internalize pertinent data necessary for rapid fire decision making. When one is unable to process the mass amounts of information, inaction occurs.

Common Problems:

  1. Not prioritizing
  2. Confusion
  3. Postponement of decision making
  4. Bad judgement
  5. Time mismanagement
  6. Lack of critical thinking
  7. Feeling psychologically stressed and overwhelmed
  8. Working hard, but feeling behind

Common Causes:

  • The delusion of a infinite range of possibilities to make money.
  • Insistence on completing all analysis before initializing action.
  • Too many variables all at once causing incessant revisiting of original signal.
  • Lack of daily objectives.
  • Choosing quantity over quality
  • Increasingly conflicting trading methods.
  • Creative speculation, that is, you can outguess the guessers.
  • Big Project Syndrome: this system will do it all, will use the latest tools, will use a new paradigm, will start with a clean slate.
  • Risk avoidance, fear of making a mistake.

Viable Solutions:

  • Keep trading system simple. Never integrate varying styles. Building a bigger model doesn’t add clarity – it creates confusion.
  • Do enough analysis to convince yourself the odds are in your favor – and then stop!
  • Refuse to review technical complexities, instead, review working functionality. If you’re not seeing simplicity in trading system design, move on.
  • Start your system design with one requirement based on sound principles, i.e, an architectural prototype. A trading system without a prototype is like a candle without a wick, which is how analysis paralysis really happens.
Go to top