rss

Market Mind Games

Denise Shull, founder of the risk and performance advisory consulting firm ReThink Group, argues that traders and investors will improve their bottom lines if they better understand their emotions. Numbers, she writes, “look you in the eye and lie.” Both rationalism and empiricism come up short. The key to market success lies in leveraging emotional introspection and analysis into informed trading behavior—first and foremost, risk management.

In Market Mind Games: A Radical Psychology of Investing, Trading, and Risk (McGraw-Hill, 2012) Shull argues that we would “be able to extract a powerful advantage if we spent more time logically analyzing what the numbers cannot tell us.” (p. 20) Quantitative analyses are merely clues, not answers to what all traders are trying to figure out—other players’ future perceptions.

As it turns out, we all can predict (some admittedly better than others—perhaps an explanation for those seemingly natural born traders) what other people are going to do. This “pattern recognition of likely human behavior” is called “theory of mind,” or ToM. It is “the key to accurately reading markets.” (p. 63)

Looked at from another perspective, trading is a case study in dealing with uncertain scenarios (as opposed to risky situations). A 2005 study found that the brain handles risk and uncertainty differently; confronted with risk, blood takes a different route through the brain than it does when dealing with uncertainty. The researcher “proffered the idea of an ‘uncertainty circuit’ or the idea that a sort of red flag went up saying ‘more information needed.’”

Shull argues that this research undercuts “maybe the second most repeated rule of trading—‘plan the trade and trade the plan.’ … This supposed truism assumes a computer model of thinking. In practicality, it leaves very little room for context and certainly none for a warning flag that more information must be obtained. Traders try to do exactly what they planned while their brain fights them to find more information or to scramble in the face of a clear, but maybe only subconsciously perceived, threat.” (p. 77) That is, although it is important to start with the right type of game plan, “good judgment on the fly will be ultimately what wins the game (remember your brain when faced with uncertainty will make judgment calls whether you ask it to or not.)” (p. 117)

To be a successful trader it is not enough to read the markets. Traders must also read themselves to figure out (not control) what feelings, physical and emotional, are fueling their judgment calls.

Feelings should be viewed as data to be captured and then analyzed. “Just like if you had any new data set to work with, first you would try to get the scope of it, look at it from different angles to get a sense of what you were dealing with, and then go about ways to monitor, track, and categorize.” (p. 125) Knowing yourself and knowing how you feel (your emotional contexts) at any given time will give you a risk management edge. It will help you avoid those “What was I thinking?” moments.

Shull spends several chapters describing some of the most common emotions traders bring to their decisions. For instance, she asks the reader to determine where he is on the spectrum between the fear of losing money and the fear of missing out. (more…)

Conventional Wisdom

conventional_wisdom_2Conventional wisdom is defined as: the generally accepted belief, opinion, judgment, or prediction about a particular matter.

Conventional wisdom is almost universally agreed upon by everyone that it rarely gets questioned, even if sometimes the belief isn’t really true.

The conventional wisdom with regards to investing is to buy and hold great companies for long periods of time so that your portfolio compounds with capital appreciation and dividend re-investment.  This approach has strong validity and is best exemplified by Warren Buffett.  He has the long term returns to prove it.

But it may not be for everybody, or else everyone would have invested like Warren Buffett.  Very few have the right skill set to buy-and-hold and be successful like Buffett, or be successful for decades.

In short term trading, the conventional wisdom is enter stocks at pivot points, trade small and cut your losses and let your gains run, and use risk and money management.  Very few can succeed with the short term trading approach, due to lack of skillset or lack of discipline.  Also, in the short term, the market fluctuates too much so that stoplosses get frequently hit.  Even if successful, it is doubtful many can beat the returns of buy-and-hold investors in the long run.

Another conventional wisdom is that in order to get bigger returns, one has to dramatically increase risk.  Like getting into leverage instruments such as options, futures and penny stocks.  Very few can succeed long term via this route, mainly due to the extreme risk factor.  

One can go through a lifetime or even several lifetimes and still cannot get through the stock market dilemma and confusion.  For many people, only through a paradigm shift in thinking and approach can they increase their chances of  market success.

A paradigm shift is a change in accepted theories, opinions or approaches, a step above and beyond, and is almost always better than the conventional wisdom.  That’s why it’s called a paradigm shift.
 
The question is:

Is there such a paradigm-shifting stock market approach out there?

R.W. Schabacker, the financial editor of Forbes magazine, penned the following advice (warning) in 1934

No trader can ever expect to be correct in every one of his market transactions. No individual, however well he may be grounded, no matter how much experience he has had in practical market operation, can expect to be infallible. There will always be mistakes, some unwise judgments, some erroneous moves, some losses. The extent to which such losses materialize, to which they are allowed to become serious, will almost invariably determine whether the individual is to be successful in his long-range investing activities or whether such accumulated losses are finally to wreck him on the shoals of mental despair and financial tragedy.

THE TRUE TEST

It is easy enough to manage those commitments which progress smoothly and successfully to one’s anticipated goal. The true test of market success comes when the future movement is not in line with anticipated developments, when the trader is just plain wrong in his calculations, and when his investment begins to show a loss instead of a profit. If such situations are not properly handled, if one or two losing positions are allowed to get out of control, then they can wipe out a score of successful profits and leave the individual with a huge loss on balance. It is just as important-nay, even more important-to know when to dessert a bad bargain, take one’s loss and count it a day, as it is to know when to close out a successful transaction which has brought profit.

LIMITS ARE A MUST

The staggering catastrophes which ruin investors, mentally, morally, and financially, are not contingent upon the difference between a 5 percent loss limit and a 20 percent loss limit. They stem from not having established any limit at all on the possible loss. Any experienced market operator can tell you that his greatest losses have been taken by those, probably rare, instances when he substituted stubbornness for loss limitation, when he bought more of a stock which was going down, instead of selling some of it to lighten his risk, when he allowed pride of personal opinion to replace conservative faith in the cold judgment of the market place. (more…)

Go to top