Archives of “endgame” tag

rss

Chess Lesson That Can Really Help Profits

  
  Education
#  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #

There are useful parallels between chess and trading.  In the below quotation there is actually more than one lesson for those willing to consider it.   

Pal Benko, a chess grandmaster said: 

“Patience is the most valuable trait of the endgame player. In the endgame, the most common errors, besides those resulting from ignorance of theory, are caused by either impatience, complacency, exhaustion, or all of the above.” 

1) Ignorance of theory

2) Impatience / Patience

3) Complacency

4) Exhaustion

See this 1 chess lesson morphed into 4 lessons:

Let me have a little go at highlighting some things that we can perhaps learn from this chess quote that apply to trading.  (I’d love it if you told me yours in the comment section below. Go on, be brave and join in – dialogue is good :-))

1) Ignorance of Theory 

Ed Seykota has been recorded as saying something like: until you master the basic literature and spend some time with successful traders, you might consider confining your trading to the supermarket.  

Naturally with trading, getting comfortable with the basics is an important step.  Make sure, however, not to end up one of those paralysed and stuck in student mode.  At some point you have to be willing to move from student to trader. One of the useful ways of ‘spending time with traders’ if you are not employed in a trading firm is to utilise things like Stocktwits, trading groups, forums etc. (more…)

Patience Is the Most Valuable Trait of the Endgame Player

  
  Education
#  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #  #

John Hussman writes:

I’ve long been fascinated by the parallels between Chess and finance. Years ago, I asked Tsagaan Battsetseg, a highly ranked world chess champion, what runs through her mind most frequently during matches. She answered with two questions – “What is the opportunity?” and “What is threatened?”

He adds:

The final minutes of a Chess game often go something like this – each side has exhausted most of its pieces, and many pieces that have great latitude for movement have been captured, leaving grand moves off the table. At that point, the game is often decided as a result of some seemingly small threat that was overlooked. Maybe a pawn, incorrectly dismissed as insignificant, has passed to the other side of the board, where it stands to become a Queen. Maybe one player has brought the King forward a bit earlier than seemed necessary, chipping away at the opponent’s strength and quietly shifting the balance of power. Within a few moves, one of the players discovers that one of those overlooked, easily dismissed threats creates a situation from which it is impossible to escape or recover.

Hussman lays out a great case for trend following–even though that is not his intent.

Go to top