rss

Expectation vs Acceptance


Take a second and think about those two words?  What do they mean to you?  To me there is a distinction.  I do not expect to lose, I accept a loss.  By accepting a loss I can focus forward.  I cannot worry about what I cannot control.  I cannot control if I lose, I can only control how much I lose (except in the rare case as stated above).

Many people stumble on the difference between expectations and acceptance, I know that I did.  Acceptance means I will take whatever my trading plan and ability allows me to take from the market.  Doing the work and following the plan, I expect to get the most of that acceptance.

For me, the worst thing that can happen is that I do not follow my plan because that is what I control.

Please note I am saying to just go crazy and not think about the consequences of trading. I cannot speak for every traders situation, the trader does.  I always hesitate in writing a post like this because it has the potential of being taken the wrong way. Once the work is done you should want to perform. The purpose of all the hard work is to find a way to be successful.

Investing vs Gambling

“Investors are the big gamblers. They make a bet, stay with it, and if it goes the wrong way, they lose it all.”

Jesse Livermore

Not having an exit strategy before initiating a trading position is worse than gambling, where you realize that the chance to lose is too big, therefore you risk only money you can afford to lose. Not having a stop loss means that you are most likely risking more than you could afford to lose. As they say amateurs go out of business because of taking big losses. Professionals go out of business by taking small profits. Cut your losses short when your stop level is hit. Even more, make sure to put your stop loss order immediately after you initiate a trade. Put your stop loss at a place where the trend you are following will be over. Let your profits run by gradually lifting you  profit protection stop order. In order to maximize your profits you have to be willing to give some of them back.

I” don’t believe anyone ever gets wiped out in the market because of bad luck; there is always some other reason for it. Either you were off when you did the trade, or you didn’t have the experience. There is always a mistake involved.”

THE 7 DEADLY SINS OF STOCK TRADING

In their book, Tools and Tactics For the Master Day Trader, Oliver Velez and Greg Capra, outline the 7 deadly sins of stock trading.  Are you guilty of commiting any of the following?

1.  Failing to Cut Losses Short:  The most frequently committed error among traders.  “We are of the school of thought that believes that traders’ most precious commodity is their original capital, and that they are doomed to utter failure if they do not do everything in their power to prevent its erosion” (91).

 2.  Dollar Counting: Focusing on how much a trade is up or down at any given moment can rob traders of profitable opportunities.  “Once a trade is taken, traders must work to forget their profits…and focus on the proper technique” (94).

3.  Switching Time Frames:  This is the error of buying in one time frame and selling in another.  The trader may buy in a longer term time frame, say the daily, but see a reversal on a 60 minute chart and sell.  This is “nothing more than a rationalization to ignore stops” (96).

4.  Needing To Know More:  Everyday traders must face the fear of pulling the trigger.  One of the symptoms of this fear is the need to know more but “the fact of the matter is that the brass ring goes to those who can act intelligently without the need to know more” (98).

5.  Becoming Too Complacent:  It is easy to become complacent when there has been a string of winners. “When a winning streak has fattened your purse, you must do everything in your power to keep your hard-earned gains and maintain the same intelligent mind-set that helped to produce those gains” (100).

6.  Winning the Wrong Way:  Many novice traders make money the wrong way and will eventually pay for it.  Traders make money the wrong way by not adhering to a rule or a stop loss and end up making money anyway.  This sets up a “taste of false success, and the market will eventually ensure that they give back this unearned profit sooner or later” (103).  The next time a rule or a stop is ignored the losses will far outweigh the previous gains.

7. Rationalizing:  This is a form of denial when in a losing trade.  Honesty, real honesty, no matter how ugly the truth, will put you above most market players unable to summon such strength from within, preferring instead to be comfortable, blaming their losses on something or someone other than themselves” (106). 

No matter which one of the seven deadly sins we have committed, we should ask ourselves the question: have we learned from them, asked for forgiveness, and are we ready to turn over a new leaf?  The market is a great teacher if we will only listen and obey.

4 Pearls of Wisdom for Traders

· The best trades come when the crowd leans the wrong way. In other words, the majority piles in one way but profits come from trading it the other way.
· Market direction is only as strong as the leadership that guides it. Stocks play follow-the-leader even when the charts tell a different tale.
· Follow the professionals in quiet times and the public in wild times.
· Good timing on bad stocks makes more money over time than bad timing on good stocks.

Evidence Based Trading

The late Ayn Rand emphasized that philosophy was the most practical of disciplines: it governs the ideas that lie behind all we do and think. The philosophical premises we assume affect how we approach trading.
A beautiful example of this is David Aronson’s new book, “Evidence-Based Technical Analysis”. It’s a well-written, thought-provoking text, with many practical examples of how to conduct data analysis in an objective way.
Starting with the premise that knowledge consists of statements that are found to be true, Aronson, writing in the positivist tradition of philosophy, excludes subjectivity as knowledge. He explains:
“The most important consequence of TA adopting the scientific method would be the elimination of subjective approaches. Because they are not testable, subjective methods are shielded from empirical challenge. This makes them worse than wrong. They are meaningless propositions devoid of information. Their elimination would make TA an entirely objective practice.” p. 148
This is bound to rub many traders the wrong way, but it’s an important challenge. What is knowledge? How do we know what we know in the markets? How can we demonstrate that knowledge is such, and not illusion? (more…)

Evidence Based Trading: Why Philosophy Matters

A beautiful example of this is David Aronson’s new book, “Evidence-Based Technical Analysis”. It’s a well-written, thought-provoking text, with many practical examples of how to conduct data analysis in an objective way.

Starting with the premise that knowledge consists of statements that are found to be true, Aronson, writing in the positivist tradition of philosophy, excludes subjectivity as knowledge. He explains:

“The most important consequence of TA adopting the scientific method would be the elimination of subjective approaches. Because they are not testable, subjective methods are shielded from empirical challenge. This makes them worse than wrong. They are meaningless propositions devoid of information. Their elimination would make TA an entirely objective practice.” p. 148

This is bound to rub many traders the wrong way, but it’s an important challenge. What is knowledge? How do we know what we know in the markets? How can we demonstrate that knowledge is such, and not illusion?

Once we start with the premise that all knowledge consists of explicit propositions that can be tested for truth, we necessarily are led toward trading that is rule-based and rigorously backtested.

Is there another, *valid* form of knowledge and trading? Can we prove that?The late Ayn Rand emphasized that philosophy was the most practical of disciplines: it governs the ideas that lie behind all we do and think. The philosophical premises we assume affect how we approach trading.